Posts Tagged ‘musicology’

The fiction of a ‘music industry’

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

It’s always bugged me that you see the term ‘music industry’ referred to in the press (usually by a representative of it) as if it were a single phenomenon.  If you work in music, you’re acutely aware of the fact that it is a complex, unruly, changeable mess of organizations, activities, markets, opportunities and legal strictures.  But to read some of the stuff that’s aimed at would-be musicians, you’d think that there’s only one route into music, being a singer-songwriter, making a hit album and living off royalties.

So I was pleased to come across Rethinking the music industry in Popular Music that says all this and more much better than I can.  The authors argue that we should talk rather of ‘music industries’ and show how organizations with partisan interests often seem to present themselves as if they represented a single (but in reality, non-existent) industry.

Share

Taruskin on ballet music

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Taruskin, Volume 4

One of the excitements of this year is being able to afford a volume of The Oxford History of Western Music. I snapped it up in Blackwells the other day, when I noticed that there was an entire chapter devoted to ballet music. I always glance through the index of music history books to see whether ballet gets a mention at all, or whether, as usually happens, it gets either erased altogether, or is treated like not much more than a bit of sellotape annoyingly stuck to the great big walking boot of serious music.

Knowing that Taruskin is one of the few people in the serious music world to admit that ballet happened at all in Western culture, and that he’s written at length about Stravinsky and Tchaikovsky’s ballet music, I was hopeful.

And indeed, there it is in chapter three, under a heading ‘A MISSING GENRE’,

“It is time to confess to a scandalous omission. An entire genre, with a history extending back as far as the sixteenth century, has been virtually missing from this account of Western art music, and it is high time to redress the neglect.” (Richard Taruskin, The Oxford History of Western Music, p. 131)

There are still big gaps, and a tendency to discuss the big names more than the people who kept the whole enterprise running (imagine a history of 20th century music that mentioned  Andrew Lloyd Webber only in passing, before moving on to a meaty interpretation of West Side Story), but it’s a darned good start.

Share

Musicology, music & terror

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Really wonderful article on musicology and music-as-torture, by Suzanne Cusick. Musicology, Torture, Repair in Radical Musicology.

Share

What Grove didn’t tell you…

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

What a treat: from the Electronic Musical Review, the entire, unexpurgated text of Philip Brett & Elizabeth Wood’s Lesbian and Gay Music that was edited down to just 2500 words by the editors at the New Grove dictionary of music, with probably the most interesting bits being first to the scalpel.This is also the final chapter in Woods & Brett’s Queering the Pitch 2nd edition, so good value for money.  It’s in here that I found the priceless bit about Tchaikovsky & Saint-Saëns doing a pas de deux together in my last post.

Share

Carmen, the habañera and El Arreglito

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

It wasn’t until a friend mentioned it recently (thanks Eddie) that I discovered that the most famous bit of music by Bizet,  the Habañera from Carmen, isn’t actually by Bizet at all, but Sebastian Yradier.  Thanks to a recent article in the Cambridge Opera Journal about this and other aspects of the music of Carmen, I found out the title of the original source (El Arreglito).  According to the article,  Yradier’s publishers Heugel did ask Bizet to cough up royalties after the Paris première of Carmen, so there is some justice in the world.

And now, thanks to the wonderful International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP), we can all see the original: click here to go a free download of the sheet music for Yradier’s El Arreglito).

Astonishing – and perhaps symptomatic of the power struggle between art music and popular music – that this is still known as ‘Bizet’s Habañera‘, even though there is no question that the music is Yradier’s. The original seems odd when you know Bizet’s version, but the more I look at it, the less I am sure that Bizet has done anything to improve it.

Another revelation (to me, it’s nothing new to Carmen buffs) is that the music for the Entr’acte in Act IV is heavily influenced by a polo by Manuel Garcia. Thanks to Google Books, you can see exactly what I mean. Click here, or see below if you’re in a browser:

Share